Добро пожаловать в Мир Майкла Джексона, Гость!    Регистрация  Или выполнить  Вход       

Заголовок Объявления
Поздравляем
anatol
Ближний и дальний круг знакомых Майкла. Предполагаемые участники и посвященные в хоакс./The inner circle of Michael Jackson. People that are supposed to be in the know, insiders involved in the hoax.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

Эстейт Майкла Джексона / Michael Jackson's Estate

#301  Сообщение Admin » 23 окт 2015, 01:14

MJ Estate preliminary defense at Robson case
Предварительная защита МД эстейта в деле Робсона


In Robson civil and probate cases, Estate’s first step was to try to get them dismissed during demurrer phase. They succeeded in probate case however their request was overruled for the civil case. Civil case has proceeded to the summary judgment phase. It is now the time for the defendant – in other words MJ Estate – to respond with an initial answer denying the allegations in the complaint and listing possible legal affirmative defenses. This is a short preliminary document.

Document here: https://www.scribd.com/doc/285207028...ivil-Complaint

Not surprisingly Estate starts their answer to the complaint by focusing on Robson’s 2005 testimony.


Estate continues with


Estate continues to focus on the significance of Robson’s 2005 testimony in very harsh words


Final blow comes with


Estate denies each of Robson’s allegations.Estate then lists 14 affirmative defenses. I will only mention a few of them here. For full list of them please refer to the document.

On their “No causation” affirmative defense, Estate turns their focus on to Wade Robson’s mother Joy Robson. Estate states


In “unclean hands, bad faith, inequitable conduct” affirmative defense, Estate once again focuses Robson’s 2005 testimony and how Robson now claims his 2005 testimony wasn’t true. Estate states


In “violation of due process and other constitutional principles of fundamental fairness” affirmative defense, Estate points out how unfair this case is to Michael Jackson. Estate states


Finally Estate reminds the court of the creditor claim and how it was dismissed. Estate points out what all of us are thinking


Estate asks for a judgment rendered in favor of MJ Estate/ Corporate defendants and legal costs and attorney feed due to frivolous nature of the case. Estate is also asking for a trial by jury (if this case survives summary judgment of course).

Although this is a very brief document and this is Estate’s preliminary answer to the complaint, it looks like the biggest weapon in Estate’s arsenal is Robson’s 2005 testimony followed by Robson family’s defense of Michael in the past. Robson will face credibility issues given his two opposite statements – 2005 testimony and his current claims. In order for a jury to rule in his favor now, they’ll need to believe that Robson lied in 2005 during a criminal proceeding and be okay with that. Wade’s mother Joy will also be an important topic. If she states she knew the alleged abuse and did nothing, she will also admit to perjury and not “protecting” Wade. It would be absurd to expect corporate entities to “protect” Robson when his mother failed to do so. If Joy claims she didn’t know about any alleged abuse, it would bring the question how could corporate entities known about the alleged abuse when Robson’s own mother didn’t. It’s an uphill battle for Robson.

Изображение

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Admin поблагодарили (всего 4):
TAIS (23 окт 2015, 23:50) • Lina (23 окт 2015, 18:34) • Liberian Girl (23 окт 2015, 10:38) • franklin5569 (23 окт 2015, 03:10)
Рейтинг: 36.36%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Admin
Благодарил (а): 11977 раз.
Поблагодарили: 14911 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#302  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 25 окт 2015, 13:25

MJ Estate Answer to Robson’s Civil Complaint

Funny, but the constant need to look into some legal cases brought against Michael Jackson during his life and even after his death has turned us into diligent students who have to continuously study the procedural rules for criminal and civil cases under the US law.

As part of this self-education program here is the MJ Estate’s preliminary answer to Robson’s civil complaint. The answer is short and impressive, and is actually the first document that concerns Robson’s claim proper, as all motions prior to that focused solely on determining whether his civil claim was legally valid at all.

As you know the probate claims filed by Robson and Safechuck were dismissed as they didn’t meet even the basic requirements set by the law, however Robson’s civil complaint was allowed by the judge to go further. Now it has entered a discovery stage and the next target in view is the summary judgment the motion for which may come from either of the sides.

Legal dictionary says that summary judgment is:

a procedural device used during civil litigaiton to promptly and expeditiously dispose of a case without a trial.
The motion for a summary judgment may be supported by declarations made under oath, excerpts from depositions under oath and all other discovery (evidence) that would be admissible at trial under the Rules of Evidence:

Unlike with pretrial motions to dismiss, information such as affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, and admissions may be considered on a motion for summary judgment. Any evidence that would be admissible at trial under the rules of evidence may support a motion for summary judgment.
Summary judgment in the United States applies only in civil cases. If the civil case survives the summary judgment it is only then that it goes to a trial.

Given the absurdity of Robson’s story I am surprised that his case has gone past the initial stage at all. However legal sources explain that

“at the early stages of litigation the court must view the facts set forth in the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff”
and this is apparently why judge didn’t dismiss the case from the start of it. And now that it took Robson three amended versions to finally state his complaint, the Estate are giving their answer to it.

The document is retyped for easier handling and the original is embedded at the end of this post.

Filed on October 9, 2015

Defendants MJJ Productions, Inc.’s and MJJ Ventures, Inc’s

answer to the third amended complaint of Wade Robson

Action filed: May 10, 2013

Defendants MJJ Productions, Inc., and MJJ Ventures, Inc., (“the Corporate Defendants”) hereby answer the Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Wade Robson as follows:


PRELIMINARY STATEMENT AND GENERAL DENIAL

This case has no merit in fact or law. Wade Robson’s allegations are directly contrary to his sworn testimony in a 2005 criminal trial where Michael Jackson was vindicated of all wrongdoing by a unanimous jury of twelve. Robson was twenty-three-years-old when he testified in 2005. He was subjected to vigorous and repeated cross-examination by a very zealous prosecutor handling the case, but Robson’s testimony never wavered.

In his complaint for money damages, Robson does not claim that he made a mistake when he testified in 2005 or that he suffered from a “repressed memory”. Rather, Robson simply claims that he chose to lie to a criminal jury in 2005. Yet, a decade later, and almost four years after Michael Jackson’s tragic death, Robson changed his story knowing that Michael Jackson is no longer here to defend himself. Robson recanted his testimony in a criminal trial for the sole and express purpose of taking money from Michael Jackson’s heirs and beneficiaries. After all, Robson’s complaint does not and cannot seek anything other than money.

There is no just or equitable way for a Court in this State to allow Robson to recover here – either he is perjuring himself today in an effort to obtain money, or he perjured himself and obstructed justice in a criminal proceeding a decade ago. There is no middle ground between those two positions – a recovery here would make a mockery of California’s system of justice.

All of the above being said, the Corporate Defendants are one hundred percent confident that Robson did tell the truth in 2005, when his sole motivation was to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Accordingly, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 431.30(d), the Corporate Defendants generally and specifically deny each of the allegations contained in the Third Amended Complaint, generally and specifically deny that Robson has sustained any injury or loss by reason of any act or omission of the Corporate Defendants, and generally and specifically deny that Robson has been damaged in any amount whatsoever.


AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE


1. The Third Amended Complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the Corporate Defendants because, among other things, the Third Amended Complaint does not explain what duty the Corporate Defendants supposedly owed to wade Robson and how that duty was supposedly breached.

SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Statutes of Limitations)


2. Robson’s claims are barred entirely by applicable statutes of limitations. Specifically, and without limitation, Robson cannot prove that his claims are within the scope of the expanded statue of limitations of Code of Civil Procedue section 340.1.

THIRD AFFIFMATIVE DEFENSE
(Violation of Due Process and Other Constitutional Principles of Fundamental Fairness)


3. Under the specific and unique circumstances of this case, any recovery by Robson would violate the Corporate Defendants’ right under the due process clauses of the state and federal Constitutions and by other principles of fundamental fairness, embodied in those charter documents. In particular, and by way of example only, Robson waited almost four years after Michael Jackson had died before he made his scurrilous and frivolous allegations. The nature of these false allegations necessarily makes it impossible for the Corporate Defendants to fully defend themselves without the assistance of Michael Jackson himself. The impossibility of fully and completely defending against Robson’s false allegations is further magnified by the fact that Robson himself steadfastly denied these allegations during the entirety of Michael Jackson’s life. Indeed, Robson and his family denied the allegations under oath on multiple occasions, including in a 2005 criminal trial where Michael Jackson was frivolously accused of misconduct and then exonerated by a unanimous jury of twelve. Accordingly, the Corporate Defendants could not possibility have been on notice, prior to Michael Jackson’s death, that Robson would bring claims like those here and that they should have been prepared to defend against such claims.

FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Unclean Hands, Bad Faith, and Inequitable Conduct)


4. As a result of Robson’s own affirmative claims that he perjured himself and obstructed justice in prior judicial proceedings, and other inequitable conduct by him and his associates, all claims in the Third Amended Complaint are barred in whole or in part by unclean hands, bad faith and inequitable conduct.

FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(No Causation)


5. Robson cannot show that any acts or omissions of the Corporate Defendants caused him any damages. In particular, and by way of example only, when Michael Jackson was frivolously accused of wrongdoing in 1993 and investigated by authorities regarding such wrongdoing, both Robson and Robson’s family, including his mother Joy Robson, publicly and prominently defended Michael Jackson and rejected the allegations of wrongdoing out of hand, including false allegations that Michael Jackson had engaged in wrongdoing with Wade Robson himself. Given that Joy Robson necessarily knew more than the Corporate Defendants about the relationship between Wade Robson and Michael Jackson, and given that Joy Robson did not take any steps to “protect” Robson (because no such steps were necessary), Wade Robson cannot possibly prove his absurd allegations that the Corporate Defendants’ supposed failure to take “reasonable steps” to prevent the alleged abuse is what caused him damage.

SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Failure to File a Creditor’s Claim and Code of Civil Procedure #366.2)


6. Wade Robson already petitioned to file a claim against the Estate of Michael Jackson, based on these exact same false allegations. The Court dismissed that petition with prejudice on May 26, 2015, and held that Robson could file no such claim against the Estate as a matter of law (as set out in the Court’s May 26, 2015 ruling dismissed Robson’s petition against the Estate), which clearly precludes Robson from recovering based on his false allegations.

7. In light of the above, and given the specific allegation of the Third Amended Complain and prior complaints, this action against the Corporate Defendants is truly an action based on the alleged personal liability of Michael Jackson himself, and not an action based on any alleged “corporate” conduct of the Corporate Defendants. This is a disguised action for money damages against the Estate of Michael J. Jackson, deceased (the Corporate Defendants are a substantial part of the rest of the Estate of Michael J. Jackson, deceased, under administration of the Superior Court, Case No. BP 117321), and is precluded for all the same reasons that the prior petition to file a claim against the Estate of Michael J. Jackson, deceased, was precluded as a matter of law.


SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Waiver)


8. As a result of Robson’s knowledge, conduct, words and actions, Robson has waived any and all of the alleged rights asserted in the Third Amended Complaint and in each and every claim therein.

EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Failure to Join Indispensable Parties)


9. Robson’s claims are barred because he has failed to join indispensable parties who are responsible for his alleged harm.

NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Latches)


10. Robson’s claims are barred entirely by the doctrine of laches.

TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
( Estoppel)


11.Robson’s claims are barred entirely by the doctrine of equitable estoppel.

ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Lack of Damages)


12. Robson’s claims in the Third Amended Complaint are barred in whole or in part, because Robson suffered neither damages nor injury; any damages or injuries alleged are attributable to causes other than any asserted acts or omissions of the Corporate Defendants.

TWELFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Speculative Damages)


13. Robson cannot recover any of the damages alleged in the Third Amended Complaint because such damages, if any, are too speculative to be recoverable.

THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel)


14. This action is barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel.

FOURTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE
(Reservation of Rights)


15. The Corporate Defendants have insufficient information upon which to form a belief as to whether it has additional, unstated affirmative defenses. The Corporate Defendants reserve the right to assert additional defenses in the event they are appropriate.

WHEREFORE, the Corporate Defendants respectfully pray for judgment against Wade Robson as follows:

1.That Wade Robson take nothing by way of his Complaint and that judgment be rendered in favor of the Corporate Defendants and against Wade Robson;

2.For costs of suit incurred herein, including reasonable attorneys’ fees due to the frivolous nature of the case and

3.For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

DATED: October 9, 2015


DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY

On every single cause of action and issue so triable, the Corporate Defendants demand a trial by a jury of their peers.

DATED: October 9, 2015

KINSELLA WEITSMAN ISER KUMP & ALDISERT LLP

By: …… (signature)…………

Howard Weitzman

Jonathan P. Steinsapir

Attorneys for Defendants MJJ Productions, Inc., and MJJ Ventures, Inc.
~

The response is a powerful one and doesn’t even need any comment.

The points that make me happiest are that Estate are one hundred per cent confident that Robson was telling the truth at the 2005 trial, when truth (and not money) was his sole motivation, and that now they demand a trial by jury and do not even consider a possibility of reaching a settlement with the liar.

The only suggestion I would make is that the Estate include Victor Gutierrez into the list of people to be deposed. In his book he claims that in June 1992 he had a long discussion with Joy Robson and shared with her his most horrible innuendoes about Michael, but she didn’t seem to care. And if she didn’t care why should the MJJ companies do, especially since they knew that there was not a grain of truth in those innuendoes?


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Изображение


Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 3):
Admin (27 окт 2015, 00:16) • franklin5569 (25 окт 2015, 18:12) • Lina (25 окт 2015, 14:25)
Рейтинг: 27.27%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#303  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 15 июл 2016, 15:13

With Trial Date Approaching, Michael Jackson Accuser Wade Robson Wants An End To Secrecy

Robson's new legal team asks the Jackson Estate to release other alleged Jackson victims from confidentiality agreements

LOS ANGELES, July 14, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Attorneys for director, dancer, and choreographer Wade Robson, the former Michael Jackson protégé who has accused the late pop superstar of sexually abusing him from the time he was seven until he turned 14, are asking the Jackson Estate to release the families of other young boys victimized by Jackson from the confidentiality agreements they signed as a condition of receiving huge monetary settlements.

"If Michael Jackson truly had nothing to hide, then the Jackson Estate should have nothing to fear from allowing the families they paid off to speak out freely," said Robson's new lead counsel, John C. Manly of the Irvine, CA, law firm of Manly, Stewart & Finaldi.

With the clock ticking down towards the March 2017 trial date for Robson's civil action against MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, the business entities that employed both him and Jackson when the abuse occurred, Robson has shifted his legal effort into high gear by bringing on Manly and partner Vince W. Finaldi to shepherd his lawsuit through trial. Experienced litigators who specialize in child sexual abuse cases, the two attorneys have helped to win more than $1 billion in trial and settlement awards for sexual abuse victims over the past 20 years.

In a letter sent today to attorneys representing the Jackson Estate, Manly noted that under California law it is "illegal to make a child sex abuse settlement confidential" and that "many large institutions in the business of protecting children have publicly released alleged victims from their confidentiality obligations when child molestation allegations have been settled." He went on to point out that "it is widely recognized that only in secrecy can child sex abuse flourish and continue." (A link to a copy of the full letter is below.)

Robson's case, originally filed in 2013, is being heard in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Named one of California's "Top 100 Attorneys" and one of California's top 30 Plaintiff Lawyers by the Los Angeles Daily Journal, John C. Manly is California's preeminent attorney representing victims of sexual abuse. Vince Finaldi, a Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated litigator, ranked at the highest level of professional excellence, also specializes in sexual abuse cases.

Over the past decade, Manly and Finaldi have been heavily involved in many of the most significant sexual abuse actions litigated across the nation, including a number of prominent cases involving the Los Angeles Unified School District and numerous actions against predator priests and the church officials who protected them in Catholic dioceses in Alaska, California, Delaware, and Oregon. In the process, they not only helped to collect more than $1 billion in damage awards on behalf of sexual abuse victims, but their work has also led to policy and procedural reforms for youth and charitable organizations that help to keep kids safe.

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (17 июл 2016, 20:50) • franklin5569 (15 июл 2016, 15:54)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#304  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 18 июл 2016, 13:03

JACKO PAL LEGAL BID Michael Jackson’s first sex abuse accuser could speak publicly for first time about relationship with popstar

US lawyers want to call Jordan Chandler as a witness in £75million lawsuit to ask about abuse from Jacko

MICHAEL Jackson’s first ever sex abuse accuser could speak publicly for the first time about his relationship with the superstar.

US lawyers want to call Jordan Chandler as a witness in a £75million lawsuit to ask about abuse by

Jacko, as well as his confidential pay-off from the King of Pop.


Изображение

Michael Jackson paid Chandler £15million not to proceed with a civil lawsuit in Los Angeles

Jackson paid Chandler £15million not to proceed with a civil lawsuit in Los Angeles after his family filed a case claiming he was molested.

Chandler has not been seen or spoken publicly in over 22 years since and the full details of the contract Jacko created have never been publicly revealed.


Изображение

Lawyers have written to the MJ estate asking they should make any confidentiality agreements public

Reports claimed that he was given a new identity and life in New York after the settlement.

But now Wade Robson, a former child dancer who also claims he was abused by Jackson, is asking a court and the singer’s estate to release all details of business documents connecting him to child abuse.

Robson is trying to prove to a civil court that he was abused long term by the Bad singer and wants Jackson’s former child companions and their families be allowed to talk openly in court.

Lawyers have written to the MJ estate asking they should make any confidentiality agreements public.
From the 1980s Jackson struck business and personal deals with kids and the FBI are said to hold papers which detail how the Grammy-winner paid out as much as £23million.


Изображение

Wade Robson is asking a court to release details connecting him to child abuse

A new letter sent by Robson’s lead lawyer John Manly to Jackson’s estate lawyer Howard Weitzman demands that all details and terms of any pay-outs be made available.

Robson, who previously testified in court claiming Jackson was not a paedophile, is now suing the star in death claiming that he suffered years of sex abuse from him.

Jackson was cleared of all counts of child sex abuse and grooming of Gavin Arvizo in criminal trial in 2005.

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
franklin5569 (18 июл 2016, 16:23) • Dream (18 июл 2016, 15:01)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#305  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 18 июл 2016, 15:23

Michael Jackson's Memorial (my experience)
July 7th, 2009, 04:43 pm

I didn't want to flood but just share my experiences from going...especially cuz i had a really good seat right in between all the celebs. My pics aren't the greatest but I just wanted to share -- all the ontd MJ fans were in my heart as I was there

Изображение


I got there quite early. There were tons and tons of people but everybody was incredibly calm and respectful. There was no madness and most of the cops were just chilling.

Изображение

photo from my seat

Got into the Staples Center, not that many celebs had come in. Chris Brown was there bright and early. Like the douche he is, he had his sunglasses on. Nobody really paid him that much attention.

Изображение

ionel richie

More people filled in...Spike Lee, Lionel Richie, Nicole Richie, Joel Madden, Jennifer Hudson were all sitting in the vicinity.

Изображение

Stevie wonder on the piano

Wade Robson who was sitting DIRECTLY behind me (breathing on ur neck close) was bawling his eyes out during this one. He had his head down in his hands for most of this song ...poor bb :(

Изображение

John Mayer

Изображение

Jennifer Hudson and MJ's dancers who were ushers on the stage

Изображение

Jermaine jackson singin Michael's fav song

Изображение

Usher....he got very emotional and spent a good time hugging each and every member of the family afterwards

Изображение

'We Are the World' performed by the singers from the This Is It tour

Изображение

Heal the World

Изображение

Jackson family

Изображение


Other tidbits (prolly saw on tv)

- Everybody stood up after almost every performance/speech
- Berry Gordy, Al Sharpton and Magic Johnson brought the house down with their stories
- When Paris Jackson spoke it was absolutely silent and all I could hear around me was sobs and tears
- the fans were very respecful most of the time (some screams here and there) but everybody was incredibly silent and patient....Wade Robson said "this is the most silent ive ever heard the staples center
- most of the people didn't know that the body was coming in and when they brought it there was an eerie silence/disbelief
- the coffin was the shiniest gold coffin I had seen and the flowers everywhere were gorgeous
- MJs kids were chewing gum hehe but poor bbs must have been overwhelmed..
- The show went very smoothly actually (besides that one break in the beginning) they pull together a great memorial very quickly

will add more as i think of them


SOURCE - Me and my crappy iPhone camera :(
more pictures on my flickr

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (20 июл 2016, 19:44) • franklin5569 (18 июл 2016, 16:22)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#306  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 02 сен 2016, 00:19

Jacko Rape Case Bombshell: Alleged Victim Wade Robson Is ‘At Risk’ Of Suicide!

Terrified lawyers warn judge that 'obtaining his testimony' ASAP is 'imperative.'

Изображение


Michael Jackson‘s alleged child rape victim, Wade Robson, could be ready to kill himself over what happened to him years ago, RadarOnline.com has learned.

Robson’s attorneys made the bombshell claim repeatedly in new court documents filed in his molestation case against Jackson’s production companies. (Robson had initially sued Jackson’s estate, but that claim was thrown out in 2015 over statute of limitations concerns.)

A trial is scheduled in the new case next spring, but Jackson’s attorneys recently filed documents demanding that they be able to take Robson’s deposition on August 24. Jackson’s team says it’s just too soon.

“The Plaintiff is a victim of sexual abuse, and has a family history of suicide,” Robson’s attorneys warned.

“As has been seen in our firm’s experience in representing sexual abuse victims over the past decades, abuse victims are at an elevated risk of committing suicide … this is not a risk that is taken lightly.”

Robson “may not be actively suicidal,” they admitted, but said “obtaining his testimony at the earliest possible time is imperative in this litigation, in order to preserve his testimony …”

They continued to insist he has a “heightened suicidality risk” because “suicidality is present” in his family, and he “has lost an immediate family member to suicide.”

Taking his deposition as soon as possible, would be “a precautionary measure,” they insisted.

Robson is already scheduled to undergo an intensive medical examination in the case, which was requested by Jackson’s team. They insisted, ‘the damages claimed … are largely based on emotional and mental injuries and we are entitled to test the fact and extent of his injuries and the cause of his injuries.”

That examination will take place on August 22.

Robson, 33, has made an incredible litany of claims against Jackson and his businesses. In court documents, he’s alleged that Jacko anally raped him, mutually masturbated with him, and forced him into fellatio. The documents claim that Jackson committed these acts between 1990 and 1997 at “his ranch in Santa Barbara County” and elsewhere.

He said he suppressed the memories for year and only recently remembered them through therapy.

He had previously denied that Jackson molested him, during Jackson’s 2005 trial against Neverland visitor Gavin Arvizo. Jackson’s estate has denied the latest allegations.


Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (04 сен 2016, 15:50) • franklin5569 (02 сен 2016, 04:27)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#307  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 12 сен 2016, 02:07

Wade Robson Civil Case: Deposition War

Since Judge Beckloff’s move to Santa Monica earlier this year, the documents related to the civil cases Beckloff oversees are no longer scanned and added to the online documents system. That meant we only had the public case summary information available to us. Unfortunately case summary system only provides limited information, showing the names of the documents filed, hearing dates and outcomes. While it provides some information, we still have to guess what is happening. As the case summary system showed some new documents at Robson case, I thought it would be best if we can try to get the documents so that we could learn the new developments in both Robson and Safechuck cases. Luckily Betty Brynes graciously agreed to go and get the documents. We wouldn’t have this information if it wasn’t for her. I’m grateful for all her help.

The last information we had about Robson case as follows:

- September 21, 2015 - Judge overruled Estate’s demurer, Robson’s case proceeds to the next phase of discovery and summary judgment.
- November 23, 2015 - Estate appeals Judge’s ruling on demurrer.
- February 17, 2016 – Estate’s appeal has been denied.
- March 3, 2016 – Case schedule including a tentative trial date is set.
- July 13, 2016 – Robson changes lawyers. Manly, Stewart, Finaldi are his new lawyers.
This brings us to August 2016. Case summary has shown two things: mental evaluation of Robson and Robson’s deposition. The motions we got from the court helped us tremendously to learn what happened over the last few months.

MJ Estate Protective Order Robson Deposition: https://www.scribd.com/document/3230251 ... Deposition

Robson Opposition: https://www.scribd.com/document/3230252 ... Opposition

After Estate’s appeal were denied, parties started to work on discovery. April 2016, there were some discovery issues about Estate’s responses to Robson’s written discovery request. That dispute was resolved amicably. At this time Estate also told Robson lawyers that they would seeking to take an independent mental examination of Robson and Safechuck


Изображение


May 2016, Robson’s then lawyers agreed to the mental examination in principle and requested Estate to pay Robson’s travel expenses to California (This is normal under CA court rules). June 16, 2016, Estate contacted Robson lawyers to determine the date of the mental examination. Parties agreed on August 1st, 2016. However Estate couldn’t get a confirmation from Robson lawyers. When they called and asked Robson lawyers said there would be some developments in the case. 2 days later Robson would change his lawyers and his new lawyers would be Manly, Stewart and Finaldi.

Robson’s new lawyers immediately objected to Robson’s independent mental examination happening on August 1st and they tried to renegotiate the terms of the independent mental examination. After discussions parties agreed that the mental examination will happen as previously agreed but they delayed the date of it to August 22, 2016.


Изображение


Soon after Robson’s new lawyers sent a notice that they would be deposing their own client Robson on August 24th, 2016. This was unexpected news for Estate as Robson lawyers never mentioned their intention before.

Then the Robson deposition has turned into a mini war. First Estate was curious as why Robson lawyers were trying to take the deposition of their own client and so soon after the mental evaluation. Robson lawyers’ initial response was that it was because Robson would be in CA for his mental evaluation and it would be a convenient time to get his deposition. Later on in their responses and in their opposition motion, they would mention how abuse victims tend to be high risk for suicide. However Robson lawyers would also state that Robson isn’t actually actively suicidal. Robson lawyers also said that they would only need one hour to depose Robson.


Изображение


Understandably Estate wasn’t happy with Robson lawyers setting the deposition date without consulting and seeking an agreement from Estate and forcing the Estate to either depose Robson at that time or not at all. Estate expressed that they wanted to depose Robson after they get the mental examination report from their expert and have time to go over it. According to the court rules, expert doctor will have a month to prepare his report. According to the media, Estate is planning to depose Robson sometime in October. In their opposition papers Robson lawyers question why Estate isn't ready for Robson deposition 3+ years later. Estate repeatedly say they want to depose Robson after they get the results of the mental examination.

Estate responded to Robson lawyers saying if they wanted to depose Robson on August 24th as a precautionary measure, it was fine. Estate lawyers would show up to the deposition and listen. However Estate wanted to preserve their right to depose Robson at a later date, after they got the mental examination report.

Robson lawyers wouldn’t agree to any of it. They wouldn’t budge on August 24th date. Robson lawyers would also say a person can only be deposed once in a case and for 7 hours. They would tell Estate lawyers, they better show up on August 24th and be prepared to ask questions or they would forfeit their chance to depose Robson.

This prompted Estate to file a motion to preserve their right to depose Robson and depose him more than 7 hours if needed after they completed the necessary discovery and ready to proceed with the deposition.

Estate pointed out that Robson should not allowed to delay mental examination and then force Estate to take his deposition at a time his counsel perceives it to be strategically advantageous.


Изображение


In their opposition papers, Robson lawyers keep misrepresenting Estate's position saying Estate wants to forbid them from deposing their own client. However from the start Estate said they were okay with Robson's lawyers deposing him on August 24th. They just wanted to be able to depose Robson at a later date themselves.

According to the case summary Estate’s request was granted. Media (THR) reported that August 24th deposition didn’t happen and the deposition will be sometime in October. Apparently parties also arguing about whether to depose Robson at Hawaii or California.


Изображение


In my personal opinion this was a very obvious tactic by the Robson lawyers to force Estate to depose Robson before they can get the mental examination report. Claiming they want to preserve Robson’s testimony because he is high risk for suicide but not actually suicidal doesn’t make any sense at this time. This case has been going on for 3+ years and Estate is planning to depose Robson in 2 months. If there was a suicide risk his deposition should have been brought up long ago. Furthermore if Robson lawyers were truly worried about preserving Robson’s testimony as a precaution, they could have taken their own deposition on the August 24th regardless of when Estate takes Robson deposition. When judge granted Estate’s request and Robson lawyers weren’t able to force Estate to depose Robson unprepared, Robson lawyers suddenly gave up their desire to depose Robson and decided to wait until October.

Finally some tidbits:

- Robson lawyers want to downplay significance of Robson’s deposition, calling it a “simple deposition”.
According to the Estate however Robson’s deposition is “critical”
- Robson family members will be deposed late September 2016.
During discovery Estate have recived Robson's all medical and therapy records.
- Robson mental examination will be done by Dr. Harrison Pope of Harvard University and McLean Hospital.
- Estate is also planning to seek a mental evaluation for Safechuck if his case survives demurrer.
- Safechuck is still represented by Gradstein and Marzano.
- Robson lawyers are trying to find experts in the areas of Standards of Care as well as Psychiatry / Psychology.
- Motions for summary judgment are due November 2016.
Note about the documents: Both motions had the Robson deposition notice and email exchange between the parties as exhibits. I only scanned those once to save time.

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (13 сен 2016, 23:20) • franklin5569 (12 сен 2016, 16:11)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#308  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 16 сен 2016, 01:12

МАЙКЛА ДЖЕКСОНА ОБВИНИЛИ В СОВРАЩЕНИИ МАЛОЛЕТНИХ

Известный австралийский хореограф Уэйд Робсон выдвинул новые требования в измененной жалобе, поданной в отношении компаний артиста MJJ Productions и MJJ Ventures.


Изображение


Уэйд Робсон, который заявлял о сексуальных домогательствах от Майкла Джексона утверждает, что покойный певец проводил “наиболее сложные операции по сексуальным домогательствам к детям“, пишет New York Daily News.

Робсон утверждает, что приближенные люди к Джексону имели “двойную цель“ и помогали ему искать детей и побуждать их посещать Ранчо Неверленд.


Изображение


Там Джексон построил развлекательный парк отдыха и открыл частный зоопарк. В этом же месте располагалась резиденция певца.

Тонко завуалированные, наделенные другими целями эти предприятия должны были проводить операции жестокого обращения с детьми с сексуальным подтекстом“, - заявляется в жалобе адвокатом Робсона, Винсом Файнальди.

По мнению истцов, MJJ Productions и MJJ Ventures проводили “наиболее сложные поставки и операции с детским сексуальным насилием, которые только известны миру“.

Согласно жалобе, Робсон впервые встретил Джексона, когда ему было пять лет в Австралии после победы в конкурсе танцев, который проводился компанией звезды.

Затем он и его семья были приглашены остаться на ранчо. По словам Уэйда, он спал вместе с Джексоном отдельно от своей семьи.


Изображение


Хореограф подчеркивает, что притязания от звезды завершились, когда мальчик достиг полового созревания. Именно тогда, говорит Робсон, он перестал “интересовать Джексона в сексуальном плане“.



Адвокат мужчины убежден, что известное ранчо Неверленд было не чем иным, как “хорошо организованной ловушкой“.

Он был специально построен, чтобы привлекать детей, где бы он мог за ними присматривать и решать над кем совершать сексуальное насилие“, - отмечает адвокат.

К слову, в 2005-м году Джексона оправдали от всех 14 обвинений сексуального характера против него. Но Робсон в 2013-м году подал на артиста в суд за якобы “развращение его в течение семи лет“. Тогда хореограф претендовал на компенсацию из наследства артиста, но суд определил невозможность удовлетворения этих требований, поскольку Робсон слишком долго не подавал иск.

Напомним, ранее Майкла Джексона обвинили в педофилии.

Смотри заявление Майкла Джексона из Неверленда:


Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 3):
Lina (18 сен 2016, 18:52) • Dream (16 сен 2016, 17:42) • franklin5569 (16 сен 2016, 17:06)
Рейтинг: 27.27%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#309  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 17 сен 2016, 00:41

Wade Robson Asks Court to Add Negligence Claims to Graphic Michael Jackson Abuse Lawsuit

Изображение


Robson claims Jackson and his inner circle "designed, developed and operated what is likely the most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization the world has known."

In a graphic new complaint, choreographer Wade Robson seeks to pursue additional negligence claims against two companies formerly controlled by Michael Jackson that he says fostered nearly a decade of sexual abuse.

In 2013, Robson sued MJJ Productions, the late musician's entertainment company, and MJJ Ventures, which employed Robson and Jackson during the time of the alleged abuse. Two months ago, the choreographer brought on attorney Vince Finaldi, who filed the motion to amend after reviewing the case file. Its claims are disturbing.

"MJJ PRODUCTIONS and MJJ VENTURES were held out to the public to be businesses dedicated to creating and distributing multimedia entertainment by MICHAEL JACKSON, however, in fact, they actually served dual purposes," writes Finaldi in the complaint filed Friday. "The thinly-veiled, covert second purpose of these businesses was to operate as a child sexual abuse operation, specifically designed to locate, attract, lure and seduce child sexual abuse victims."

Robson claims Jackson and his inner circle within the two companies "designed, developed and operated what is likely the most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization the world has known."

The choreographer says he first met the late pop star when he was five years old, after winning a "dance-a-like" competition run by MJJ Productions in Australia, where Robson was born. Two years later, his family took a trip to California because Robson's dance company was performing at Disneyland. Robson's mother contacted Jackson's assistant Norma Staikos to set up a meeting, according to the complaint, which describes Staikos as "a 'madam' or 'procurer.' " The family was invited to stay at Neverland Ranch, where Robson slept in Jackson's bed while his family stayed in separate guest quarters.

It was that weekend, Robson claims, that Jackson first sexually abused him. He was seven years old.

The graphically detailed complaint describes encounters ranging from French kissing to penetrative sex. Robson claims the abuse continued until he was 14, but became less frequent when he "began showing signs of puberty" and Jackson was "no longer as interested in him sexually."

In the following years, Robson would be called to testify in a civil suit brought by Jordan Chandler and in Jackson's criminal trial. Leading up to his testimony, he says the singer called him nearly every day to coach him and " 'brain washed' him into being a 'good soldier.' " He testified that no abuse had occurred.

Robson says he loved Jackson like a father and did not believe he was sexually abused until he entered psychotherapy following a nervous breakdown in 2012. He hasn't worked since.

Now, six months prior to the scheduled trial, Finaldi wants to amend the complaint to "rectify various flaws... simplify the complaint, and plead various causes of action/allegations that were omitted from the operate complaint."

Finaldi seeks to add several negligence claims to the suit, arguing the MJJ companies "breached their duty to take reasonable protective measures to protect minor children in their charge."

He's also seeking to withdraw the causes of action of childhood sexual abuse, sexual battery, assault and battery and negligent infliction of emotional distress, as well as allegations regarding the estate.

Attorneys for MJJ have not yet responded to a request for comment.

Trial is currently scheduled for March 13.

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (18 сен 2016, 18:57) • franklin5569 (17 сен 2016, 16:12)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Обвинения Уэйда Робсона и Джеймса Сэйфчука

#310  Сообщение Liberian Girl » 18 сен 2016, 04:33

Michael Jackson Accuser Wade Robson Recalled Alleged Abuse After Becoming a Father: 'This Wasn't Loving, Normal Behavior,' Says Lawyer

Celebrity choreographer Wade Robson recently amended his 2013 legal claim that he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson with the startling allegation that the artist operated the "most sophisticated public child sexual abuse procurement and facilitation organization the world has known."

The fact that he waited until decades after the alleged abuse took place – and three years after Jackson had died – has raised some eyebrows, but his lawyer says that Robson began to reflect upon the memories of the abuse he always had and saw them in a different light after becoming a father to now 5½-year-son Koa.

"He just recently made that determination soon after giving birth to his first child," attorney Vince Finaldi tells PEOPLE exclusively. "He started having all these things come up. This wasn't loving, normal behavior – things that the world just won't understand. If this were my child I would absolutely not be okay with it. This is sexual abuse. He went to a therapist."

Though the original complaint was thrown out of court in 2015, Finaldi explains that a previous legal effort named the late singer's estate in their claim, despite the fact that the statue of limitations had passed. (Howard Weitzman, an attorney for the Jackson estate, hailed the ruling at the time, saying the estate believed Robson's earlier sworn testimony in Jackson's defense "when his sole motivation was 'to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.'")

Since he's been brought on, Finaldi's strategy is to continue with the cases against the late singer's business entities, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, which remain active.

"What triggered the amendment complaint is our review of the files and materials, and our determination that [Jackson] was in fact operating MJJ Productions as a child sexual abuse procurement operation. That was unquestionably the second purpose of this business," Finaldi alleges. "He was using it to pay for gifts for kids and parents in order to groom them for later sexual abuse. He was using it to pay for trips for kids, for plane tickets, for hotels to bring them with him on concerts and to also employ some of these kids as 'dancers' – but he would also be putting them into his room and sleeping with them at night and sexually abusing them."

He continued: "None of these are standard operations for an entertainment company that's supposed to be distributing music as an entertainment."

According to Finaldi, Robson, 33, is intent on "getting answers as to why this happened. If you can't figure out why this was allowed to happen, you can't protect kids from this happening in the future in the entertainment industry in general. One of his main concerns is making sure that this does not happen again and kids are protected. He wants to get the real story out there."

Representatives for MJJ have yet to respond to PEOPLE's request for comment.

While the case is prepared, Finaldi says that Robson continues to work on his personal demons.

"As with any other survivor, there are good days and there are bad days. You just have to plod through it, so he's still in therapy. He's working his depths going from being a victim to a survivor, and he's really committed to it. This is really hard work. This is lifetime work."

The trial is currently set for March 2017.

Я готова верить, но надо знать во что!

Показать ссылки поста



За это сообщение автора Liberian Girl поблагодарили (всего 2):
Lina (18 сен 2016, 19:09) • franklin5569 (18 сен 2016, 17:02)
Рейтинг: 18.18%
 
Аватара пользователя
offline

Liberian Girl
Благодарил (а): 2484 раз.
Поблагодарили: 13498 раз.

Пред.След.

Вернуться в ЛЮДИ И СОБЫТИЯ / PEOPLE AND EVENTS

cron